Definitions from Wikipedia (Glidden Co. v. Zdanok)
▸ noun: Glidden Co. v. Zdanok (consolidated with Lurk v. United States), 370 U.S. 530, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that judges of the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals were judges created under Article III of the Constitution (also known as Article III judges).
▸ Words similar to glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Usage examples for glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Idioms related to glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Wikipedia articles (New!)
▸ Words that often appear near glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Rhymes of glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Invented words related to glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ noun: Glidden Co. v. Zdanok (consolidated with Lurk v. United States), 370 U.S. 530, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that judges of the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals were judges created under Article III of the Constitution (also known as Article III judges).
▸ Words similar to glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Usage examples for glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Idioms related to glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Wikipedia articles (New!)
▸ Words that often appear near glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Rhymes of glidden co. v. zdanok
▸ Invented words related to glidden co. v. zdanok