Literary authors employ the term "sophism" to denote arguments that appear deceptively sound yet ultimately rest on fallacious or misleading reasoning. Often, it is used to characterize complex theoretical constructs that weave through entire discourses, imbuing them with an aura of credibility while masking their inherent logical flaws [1, 2]. In critical discussions—ranging from political economy to religious and ethical debates—the word serves to challenge assertions that rely on deceptive verbal subtleties or popular but unexamined assumptions [3, 4, 5]. Moreover, some writers invoke the term with a tone of both irony and disdain, suggesting that such reasoning not only fails rigorous scrutiny but also misleads its audience through artful rhetoric [6, 7].