Writers frequently use the term “philanderer” to underscore a character’s unfaithfulness or a cavalier attitude toward love, often layering the label with irony or social critique. It can serve as both a pejorative marker and a nuanced portrayal of a man whose amorous exploits border on the farcical, as when a character’s lighthearted self-identification contrasts with the harsher judgments of others [1, 2]. In some works the descriptor is employed to satirize the ideals of modernity and romantic inconstancy [3, 4], while in others it dramatizes the fine line between charm and ignominy through understated humor and pointed commentary on societal expectations [5, 6]. This multifaceted usage enriches the narrative, offering insight not only into personal character but also into the broader cultural attitudes toward love and loyalty.