The term "loquacity" has been deployed in literature with a rich variety of connotations, often extending beyond mere talkativeness to embody a character’s overall expressive quality or even a symbolic gesture. In some works, authors use it to capture an excess of words or a kind of unfiltered verbosity—as seen in Augustine’s ironic sale of a "loquacity" in [1] and Conrad’s warning about "fits of loquacity" in [2]. In contrast, Hardy employs the term in nuanced ways, referring not only to verbal expression but also to nonverbal cues; in one instance, the "loquacity of her face" in [3] suggests that even silence can speak volumes, a theme neatly counterposed with Gabriel’s meaningful silence in [4]. Other writers like Eliot [5] and Maupassant [6] leverage the term to illustrate astonishment and charm in their characters’ demeanor, while Dumas [7] and Lewis [8] note its fluctuation as an indicator of mood or societal commentary. Across these diverse texts, "loquacity" emerges as a flexible literary device that captures the interplay between speech, silence, and the deeper layers of human communication.