The term "indemnity" has been employed in literature both as a technical financial concept and as a symbol of broader moral and political principles. In works such as Keynes's The Economic Consequences of the Peace, indemnity is frequently discussed in the context of international treaties and reparations—its application ranges from considerations of whether financial settlements should be imposed ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) to comparisons of war-induced liabilities ([6], [7]). Historical texts like those of Edmund Luce and Napoleon also refer to indemnities as concrete sums to be paid, emphasizing its role in the mechanics of peace and conflict resolution ([8], [9], [10]). At the same time, philosophers like Rousseau and literary figures such as Poe have invoked indemnity to highlight moral or existential deficits, suggesting that some wrongs may leave one beyond the scope of any human compensation ([11], [12]). This dual usage demonstrates how "indemnity" has served not only as a practical instrument in economic and legal discourse but also as a potent metaphor for justice and rectification in the broader cultural imagination ([13], [14]).