Literary notes about indefensible (AI summary)
The word "indefensible" has been employed in literature to denote actions, beliefs, or even linguistic practices that lack justification or merit critical disapproval. In historical narratives, it critiques the moral failings of notable figures, as when Cid is accused of "not a few thoroughly indefensible acts" [1]. The term also extends into philosophical discourse, where a faith in a singular radical insight is dismissed as indefensible despite its truth [2]. In strategic and political texts, such as in Sunzi’s analyses and Keynes’s discussions, the label is applied to actions and policies lacking sufficient rationale [3, 4]. Even in literary fiction, characters' deeds or personal decisions are questioned through this term, highlighting moments of personal failing [5]. Moreover, its usage crosses into stylistic criticism where even a misplaced adjective preceding a noun is termed indefensible [6], while its presence in religious texts underscores its gravitas in moral and societal evaluations [7].