The term “inconstant” has long been a powerful literary device used to evoke the fleeting, unpredictable nature of both the external world and human character. In works ranging from early Romantic texts to Enlightenment treatises, authors deploy the word to describe the mutable quality of natural phenomena—such as the “inconstant sun” that brightens the green hills [1] or the ever-changing winds of fortune [2, 3]—as well as the variability inherent in human emotions and relationships, as seen when love is likened to the moon’s shifting phases [4] or when a character’s faithfulness is called into question [5, 6]. This dual application underscores a broader philosophical commentary on the impermanence of constancy itself—as both personal ideals and societal foundations can be as erratic as nature’s own rhythms [7, 8, 9].