Literary notes about eloquence (AI summary)
Throughout literature, the term "eloquence" has been used in diverse ways to capture the art and power of expression. In some works it denotes a refined, almost sacred quality of language—as Montaigne suggests, one should not alter eloquence itself ([1]), and Jefferson links it to influential political persuasion ([2]). Other authors emphasize its emotional potency, with Napoleon describing language that inflames the heart ([3]) and Proust exclaiming its striking impact ([4]). Meanwhile, eloquence can also be critiqued or seen as insufficient in itself; Rousseau notes that even Demosthenes’ acclaimed style cannot animate a lifeless body ([5]), while others imply that true eloquence lies not only in artful speech but also in the underlying sincerity and intention ([6], [7]). Thus, across various contexts—from political oratory to intimate expressions—the word "eloquence" serves as a multifaceted emblem of language’s capacity to enchant, persuade, and even deceive.