Literary usage of the term dissidence often conveys a multifaceted sense of rebellious separation from dominant norms, whether in religious, political, or social contexts. It conveys a spirit of active opposition, as seen in the portrayal of individuals like Celio Secondo Curione, whose overt break with Church orthodoxy marked him for persecution [1], and in the depiction of heterodoxy as a source of creative divergence [2]. The term not only reflects open challenges to established authority—as in accounts of organized dissent within religious institutions [3]—but also suggests more subtle, internal currents of discontent and the hidden underbelly of conformity, where a cloak of outward compliance might mask inner rebellion [4]. Across these narratives, dissidence is presented both as a philosophical stance and as a potent force that destabilizes rigid societal structures, underscoring its enduring role as a symbol of transformative critique [5][6][7].