The term “dialectical” in literature is often employed to denote a dynamic interplay of opposites, a method of inquiry that aims to unveil hidden consistencies and conflicts in thought, experience, and natural phenomena. For example, Santayana’s work frequently presents history and valuation as dialectical processes that are not merely descriptive but active conditions shaping human progress [1], [2], [3]. In a similar vein, Plato’s writings elevate dialectical reasoning as a mark of a comprehensive mind, suggesting that true knowledge requires the synthesis of conflicting ideas [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Meanwhile, Nietzsche uses the concept to critique natural instincts and expose the inherent tensions within morality and aesthetic judgment [9], [10]. Across these examples, the term serves as a versatile tool to explain how various elements—whether in science, art, or social relations—interact in a manner that transcends simple cause and effect, revealing richer, more complex structures underlying apparent reality [11], [12], [13].