The term "diacritical" has been used in literature to refer both to the functional aspects of orthography and to the challenges arising from its application or absence. In Xenophon’s work, for instance, it is noted that the diacritical marks have been lost, implying a disruption in the intended phonetic guidance [1]. In contrast, Mickiewicz discusses a specific diacritical application to the letter i, used to modify a preceding sibilant [2]. The concept also extends to non-Latin scripts; for example, Griffis explains how diacritical marks can expand the Japanese syllabary from forty-seven to seventy letters [3]. Additionally, Marco Polo’s account highlights that without diacritical points, distinct words may become indistinguishable, possibly due to clerical errors [4]. Finally, Haggard illustrates a transcription approach that forgoes diacritical marks entirely when rendering Greek fragments, demonstrating another facet of their literary use [5].