The term "demonstrable" has been deployed across literary, philosophical, and scientific texts to denote that which is capable of being clearly shown or proven. In psychoanalytic contexts, Freud employs the term to specify elements like dream symbols and peculiarities in regressive representations, arguing their demonstrability as observable facets of the unconscious ([1], [2]). In criminal psychology, Hans Gross presents demonstrable habits as tangible facts that can explain otherwise mysterious behaviors ([3], [4]), while Coleridge contrasts the demonstrable with the intuitive, suggesting that certain mathematical propositions spring from a practically felt idea rather than from plain demonstration ([5]). Philosophers such as Kant and Santayana use "demonstrable" to underline the essential requirement that concepts and the objects they represent must be subject to verification, even as Santayana expands the notion to elements of human progress and art ([6], [7], [8], [9], [10]). The term, thus, appears both as a marker of empirical evidence in scientific and judicial discourse and as a conceptual tool in philosophical and literary debates, as evidenced not only by these examples but also by its occasional juxtaposition with myth or the ineffable as noted by Whitman and Jefferson ([11], [12]).