The term "arbitrator" in literature has often been imbued with the role of a neutral, authoritative judge who is essential for resolving disputes and maintaining order. In early modern political thought, authors like Hobbes used the term to designate a figure to whom disputing parties submit their rights, emphasizing the idea of natural law and social contract ([1], [2], [3]). Similarly, in works that span cultures and epochs—from Cicero’s insistence on royal adjudication, where private individuals could not serve as arbitrators ([4]), to Locke’s commentary on the lack of recourse for the conquered ([5])—the arbitrator emerges as a central facilitator of justice. The concept is also employed in more personal or informal contexts, as seen in literary works from Galdós ([6]) and Mickiewicz ([7]), where the arbitrator serves as both mediator and emblem of fairness, and even in settings as varied as a prince's intervention in disputes ([8]) or a symbolic arbiter represented by nature in La Fontaine's fables ([9]). These examples collectively illustrate how the arbitrator has come to represent both the pursuit of impartial judgment and the broader quest for equitable social order in literature ([10], [11], [12]).