Writers employ the word “able” to convey a range of possibilities—from latent capability to the actualization of potential—often contextualizing the difference between what could be and what is. In some narratives, “able” marks missed opportunities or conditional action, as when a character might have been capable of momentous change had circumstances allowed it ([1], [2], [3]). In other instances, the term underscores empowerment or the clear demonstration of competence, such as when characters navigate obstacles with resourcefulness or even irony ([4], [5], [6]). Authors sometimes use “able” to highlight the tension between inherent talent and external constraints, whether illustrating a subtle triumph over adversity or an unfulfilled wish to act ([7], [8], [9]). In doing so, the choice of this modest word deepens character portrayal and enhances narrative complexity by inviting readers to reflect on the interplay between possibility, limitation, and fate ([10], [11]).