In literature, the term "violator" is often employed to underscore a profound breach of trust or duty, whether on a grand political stage or in the realm of individual conscience. For instance, Livy uses the term to depict a leader whose actions symbolically and literally break solemn agreements, describing a figure as "the violator of the treaty between Rome and Alba" [1] and later questioning if he is "the infringer of human treaties and the violator of the law of nations" [2]. In contrast, Guy de Maupassant adopts a more personal tone by labeling someone as "a violator of consciences," thus shifting the focus from diplomatic betrayal to moral transgression [3]. This variety in context reflects the word's adaptability in conveying the gravity of transgression across different societal and ethical dimensions.