In literature, the term "solecism" is employed in a multifaceted way—sometimes denoting a grammatical or stylistic error, but more often serving as a potent metaphor for deeper failings or transgressions. For instance, Thomas Carlyle uses the word to castigate not only literal errors in language but also political and moral missteps, describing a court or even a revolutionist as embodiments of core faults or aberrations ([1], [2], [3]). Carlyle extends its metaphorical reach further to encompass the disintegration of societal order, with expressions like "World-Solecism" underscoring profound systemic breakdowns ([4], [5], [6]). Additionally, other authors such as Bernard Shaw and Dale Carnegie’s collaborators recognize its usage in highlighting errors ranging from minor lapses in decorum to major violations of accepted norms, as seen in contexts addressing both rich men’s faults and the precise distinctions among various misstatements ([7], [8], [9], [10]).