In literary works the term "slothful" is often laden with moral and social significance, used to describe not only physical laziness but also spiritual and intellectual inertia. In many sacred texts the word functions as a stern admonition—a call not to neglect one’s duties or let indifference settle into everyday life ([1], [2], [3], [4]). At the same time, in narrative and dramatic texts it paints vivid portraits of characters whose inactivity or excessive ease is both a personal failing and a source of societal critique, as seen in passages that highlight wasted potential or derelict leadership ([5], [6], [7]). Moreover, in treatises discussing broader issues of governance and human nature, the term underscores the detrimental effects of idleness on progress and prosperity ([8], [9]). Across these varying contexts, "slothful" emerges as a versatile descriptor that criticizes the neglect of both moral and practical responsibilities.