"Naught" frequently functions in literature as a potent expression of absence, insignificance, or futility. Poets and dramatists alike employ the term to denote not only literal nothingness but also the void left by efforts or emotions, as illustrated when character actions “come to naught” or when achievements are rendered meaningless ([1], [2]). At times, it underscores a dismissal of value or importance—if something is “naught,” then it possesses no substantive merit—while in other contexts it heightens the dramatic narrative by contrasting the presence of grandeur or passion with an overwhelming emptiness ([3], [4]). Moreover, the usage of "naught" often conveys a philosophical meditation on impermanence or the limits of human endeavor, inviting readers to reflect on what remains when all is stripped away ([5], [6]). This layered employment enables authors to evoke both a stylistic and an emotive impact that deepens the literary experience.