In literature, the word "lout" is employed to depict characters who are unrefined, clumsy, or socially awkward, often serving as a marker for lower social status or crude behavior. Writers use it to evoke a vivid image of a person lacking in grace or intellect, as when a driver greedily devours ginger cake [1] or when a provincial character is portrayed as both pursuing his destiny and embodying an unsophisticated nature [2]. The term frequently carries a satirical or humorous tone, underscoring the contrast between the crude behavior of the lout and the refined qualities of other characters, as seen in the portrayal of boorish rural simplicity alongside urbane wit [3, 4]. Throughout various narratives, from Shakespeare to Chekhov, "lout" is versatile—at times an insult that highlights stupidity and physical clumsiness [5, 6], and at other moments a vehicle for social commentary on class and cultural pretensions [7, 8].