The term "ineligible" has often been deployed in literature to denote a state of disqualification or unfitness for certain roles, relationships, or activities. In Austen’s depiction, for instance, it subtly conveys social acceptability as a measure of character suitability [1]. Similarly, Scadding and Twain use it in political and societal contexts to denote formal disqualifications from roles or offices [2], [3]. Fitzgerald employs the term in multiple hues—from romantic irony when referring to the “totally ineligible” men who pique his interest [4], to self-deprecating commentary about academic shortcomings [5]—while also illustrating social hierarchies in academic and organizational settings [6]. Shaw and Yogananda extend its use into more nuanced personal and situational evaluations, where eligibility relates to transformative personal circumstances or rigors of examination [7], [8]. Additionally, historical critiques, as found in the suffrage literature, critique exclusionary practices that render individuals ineligible based on gender [9].