In literature, "inadmissible" has been used as a powerful qualifier to denote ideas, evidence, or actions that fall outside accepted norms or rules. For instance, in legal and judicial contexts, it is deployed to dismiss testimony or arguments as unacceptable, as seen in Solomon Northup’s account [1] and Cicero's discussion [2]. Philosophers and theorists similarly invoke it to reject certain premises or interpretations—Immanuel Kant [3] and Henry Sidgwick [4] employ the term to signal that a proposed idea lacks legitimacy within a structured system of thought. Authors like Edgar Allan Poe [5, 6] and Charlotte Brontë [7, 8] use "inadmissible" to describe elements that are conceptually or contextually out of place, while historical and geographic evaluations found in the works of Rizal [9] and Marco Polo [10, 11] reveal its application in critiquing unsuitable or implausible phenomena. Together, these examples illustrate a broad application of the term across genres, serving as a linguistic tool to designate anything that is fundamentally unacceptable or inapt for consideration.