The term "freethinker" has been employed diversely in literature, often reflecting the author's attitude toward independent thought and its consequences. In some works, such as Shaw's, it is used almost as a neutral or even commendatory label for someone who refuses to conform to conventional norms [1]. In contrast, authors like Dostoyevsky and Nietzsche imbue the term with a more critical nuance—suggesting that independent thought might be problematic or even subversive, especially in the context of religious or social conventions [2][3][4]. Alexander Pope's usage, found in several passages, oscillates between irony and derision, hinting that freethinking might lead to impracticality or folly [5][6]. Meanwhile, references in texts by Maupassant and Byron extend the concept to include affiliations with broader counter-cultural or nonconformist attitudes [7][8]. Together, these examples illustrate that "freethinker" in literature is a multifaceted term, simultaneously embodying both admiration for intellectual independence and criticism for its potential disruptive implications.