The term "fallacy" in literature is wielded both as a precise label for logical missteps and as a broader commentary on flawed reasoning within human thought. Philosophical reflections, such as those by Santayana, Kant, and Emerson, invoke it to signal intrinsic errors in how natural and moral truths are perceived [1, 2, 3]. In more technically inclined discussions, particularly those in the realm of symbolic logic exemplified by Lewis Carroll’s analytical breakdowns, it categorizes specific types of reasoning mistakes [4, 5, 6, 7]. Meanwhile, in psychological and sociological contexts, figures like William James extend the term, critiquing common cognitive misunderstandings through designations like the "psychologist's fallacy" [8, 9, 10]. Across these varied usages, "fallacy" emerges as a versatile literary device that both unmasks erroneous lines of thought and underscores the complex interplay between perception, logic, and belief [11, 12, 13].