The word "extort" has been employed in literature to evoke a sense of forced extraction—whether of allegiance, rights, or even material wealth—imbued with both political and moral overtones. For example, in John Milton’s works ([1], [2]), the term conveys a steadfast refusal to allow even divine power to forcibly obtain tribute or submission, emphasizing the heroic nature of individual resistance. Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley similarly uses it in "Frankenstein" ([3], [4], [5]) to underline the inviolable boundary that must not be breached by coercive methods, highlighting a profound personal assertion against torture and oppression. In contrast, accounts such as those by Bartolomé de las Casas ([6]) and the journals of Lewis and Clark ([7]) portray extortion in terms of economic exploitation and material demands, while literary and philosophical texts by Nietzsche ([8], [9]) and even political rhetoric as seen in works like Shaw’s "Pygmalion" ([10]) extend the concept to contexts of rights and power dynamics. This varied usage underscores the term’s evolution from describing literal physical coercion to embodying broader, abstract struggles against forces that attempt to claim what is not freely given.