Literary notes about Drivel (AI summary)
In literature, the word "drivel" is often deployed as a dismissive label for talk or writing that is deemed foolish, banal, or lacking in intellectual substance. Authors and characters alike use it to mark speech that ranges from immature and nonsensical to overtly absurd, as when a character insists on adult-level drivel rather than schoolboy babble [1] or when speech is condemned as “absolute drivel” once arguments commence [2]. The term also appears in critical discourses where it contrasts with what is held up as dignified language, highlighting the perceived gap between meaningful communication and empty, sentimental rhetoric [3, 4]. Sometimes, drivel serves as a humorous or sarcastic jab designed to dismiss overly elaborate or unworthy commentary, urging interlocutors to forgo drivel in favor of substance [5, 6, 7]. In all its uses, the term encapsulates an aesthetic judgment—a quick and easy shorthand for the dismissal of thoughts that fail to meet the speaker's standard of clarity, wit, or truth.