The term "discountenance" has been used variably in literature to denote a form of disapproval or opposition, whether in the context of confrontation, political policy, education, legal regulation, or personal conduct. For example, in early texts, such as Kersey Graves’ work [1], the word conveys a sense of actively resisting confrontation, almost to the point of dismissiveness. In political narratives like that of Dumas and Maquet [2], it suggests an effort to counter or deter rebellious behavior for the sake of national stability. In educational discourses [3], the term subtly critiques undue enthusiasm that might lead to unhealthy competition. Similarly, in discussions of societal norms and legal practices [4], it functions as an instrument for formally invalidating certain behaviors, such as gaming. Finally, as seen in Fitzgerald’s depiction [5], discountenance is employed to indicate a reservation that does not ultimately undermine established belief, thereby enriching its nuanced role in literary expression.