In literature, the term "dialectician" is employed to capture a complex interplay of intellectual prowess, argumentative technique, and even a measure of moral or philosophical authority. Classical texts such as Plato’s Republic frequently contrast the dialectician with the mathematician—portraying the former as someone who not only grasps the essence of things through division and generalization ([1], [2]), but also occupies a superior position in the hierarchy of intellect ([3], [4], [5]). At times, however, the label is used somewhat critically; for example, Nietzsche portrays dialecticians as wielding their argumentative skill in a manipulative or even tyrannical way, capable of paralyzing their opponents or rendering arguments easily dismissed ([6], [7], [8], [9], [10]). Meanwhile, the work of Diogenes Laertius and others provides historical anchorage to the term, identifying various figures as dialecticians, thereby underscoring its longstanding association with the art of profound, sometimes contentious, discourse ([11], [12], [13]).