The term "concurrence" has been employed in literature with a remarkable range of meanings. In historical and political contexts, it often signifies formal agreement or endorsement, as seen in Livy's discussions of wartime preparations ([1], [2], [3]) and Edmund Burke’s criticisms of governmental practices ([4], [5], [6]). Philosophers like Rousseau and Hume have used it to denote the very necessity of consent or the intricate meeting of causes that brings about an effect ([7], [8], [9], [10]), while others, such as Coleridge and Bacon, explore its role in rational explanation ([11], [12]). Additionally, in literary narratives by authors like Jane Austen, George Eliot, and Edgar Allan Poe, the word frequently captures both collective agreement and the serendipitous co-occurrence of events ([13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]). Even in French learning materials, "concurrence" shifts to indicate competition or rivalry ([20], [21], [22]). This diverse usage underscores the word’s flexibility, functioning both in the literal sense of simultaneous occurrence and in the more abstract, metaphorical sense of aligned intentions or circumstances.