The term “assumption” in literature is remarkably versatile, functioning both as a premise for argument and as a lens for human attitudes. In some works it is presented as an unsubstantiated leap of faith, one that diverges from pure reason—for instance, when it is described as entirely devoid of logical support ([1], [2]). In contrast, other texts reveal its emotive power, using it to characterize a person's demeanor or the social implications of presuming dignity or authority (as seen in the portrayal of scorn or self-importance in narratives) ([3], [4], [5]). Philosophers and thinkers also invoke the term in a technical sense, employing it as a critical underpinning of deductive reasoning and as a condition for further inquiry, as evident in the work of Kant, Plato, and others ([6], [7], [8]). Moreover, in historical and religious contexts it identifies ceremonial or authoritative acts, thereby bridging abstract thought with institutional legitimacy ([9], [10], [11]).